Here is a list of feature requests that, if implemented, would dramatically raise Evernote's competitive standing:īONUS 1 (not part of the absolute competitive minimum)Įvernote loses ground because it lacks a calculation engine of any kind. More specifically, a note should be easily navigated (internal links), the note-space should be easily traversed (better linking between notes), and the text editing needs to be top notch (better markdown support, math and equation support, and better code blocks with syntax highlighting). Low-friction content creation (the main reason why I have not switched)īut Evernote sorely lacks in the critical areas of text editing and note navigation, which are the absolute competitive minimum that a player in this space needs to get right. As such, while it is easy and it feels great to get content into Evernote, it is not so great to write/edit/use Evernote.Įvernote leads or is on par with competitors in the following areas: But, in addition to expanding into other features, Evernote's competitors are refining and perfecting the text editing and note navigation experience. ![]() While its competitors are increasingly diversifying into wikis, kanban boards, spreadsheet engines, full on databases, graph networks, and AI-assisted creation spaces, Evernote keeps things straightforward and therefore achieves a very low-friction file-cabinet like experience. Evernote is content with the humble note-centric view of the world.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |